Circumcision: Whose Choice is it?

I am Kathleen, owner of both Cottontail Baby andMamaclothonline and, most importantly, mother to three young boys. It is in my Mom role that I have been reading with great interest the news that San Francisco is considering a ballot initiative that would outlaw circumcision for boys under 18. The ban would make circumcising minors punishable by a fine of $1000 and up to one year in jail. There would be no religious exemptions. The more I read and the more I learn, the more I am finding myself quite conflicted about this proposed ban.

Certainly, on the one hand, circumcision is a form of mutilation of the body of a very much innocent and helpless infant. If God made it this way, why do we need to tamper with it as the actor Russell Crowe infamously tweeted earlier this week? I agree with this and feel the same way regarding this and a whole host of cosmetic procedures.

On the other hand, I do understand all the studies that indicate the health issues related to circumcision (some studies in Africa suggest that circumcision helps stop the spread of AIDS). I also understand the cultural and religious rituals associated with circumcision especially amongst Muslims and Jews and the importance placed on this rite of passage in both religions. Circumcision is so important to both groups that a ban of the practice could be seen as violating one’s First Amendment rite to practice one’s religion as one sees fit.

One study I read indicated that while only 30% of males world wide are circumcized, over 80% of males in the US are circumcized. Clearly, this is a US cultural issue in many ways. I am curious to know why this is so important and prevelent in our country but significantly less so world wide? Does it have something to do with our anti-septic, shrink wrapped culture? Are we just a nation of conformers and afraid, even for our tiny infants, to go against the norm? Are we lemmings who do not think for ourselves but just blindly and unquestionably approve unnecessary procedures?

One issue in the debate that I find most interesting is the dichotomy between what is good for the males and what is good for the females (female genital mutilation). Female circumcision (the removal of the clitoris) is illegal in this country. The San Francisco ban would simply provide males the same protection that is already enjoyed by females. I have yet to speak to any parent who believes in circumcision for boys who feels the same way for girls. Why is that? Is it that the process for girls is so much more barbaric (done when they are so much older and in such a crude fashion leading to significant illness, disfigurement and, occasionally, death)? I think that has to be part of it. In addition, for boys, circumcision is done for religious and health reasons but for girls, it is a cultural practice designed to repress women by eliminating their ability to experience sexual pleasure.

In the end, is this simply a parents rights issue? Does the government really need to legislate every choice parents make for the children? Is this just another in a long line of Big Brother laws such as outlawing spanking, criminalizing parents when their children misbehave (many laws that penalize and, in some cases, jail parents for having truant children for instance) or criminalizing parents who smoke in cars in which their children are riding.

What do you think? Is this a clear cut issue for you or are there many shades of grey? What would you do if you lived in San Francisco and this law passes?

GIVEAWAY

In terms of a giveaway for this sunny month of June, I would like to give a Thirsties Fab Duo. The relatively new Fab Duos are so soft and squishy and remind me of wrapping up in a towel after a long day at the beach. They come in fun, summertime colors such as mango, ocean and honeydew. No matter what you choose to do in regards to circumcision, these are great, comfy, wonderful diapers for your children.

So, to enter the drawing, you need to do the following:

  1. Comment on this blog post and tell us what you think
  2. Fan Cottontail Baby on Facebook
  3. Fan the Cloth Diaper Retailers Cooperative on Facebook
  4. Join the Cottontail Baby mailing list

Good luck!

13 Responses

  1. by Susan M. On June 21, 2011 at 7:03 am

    I have a hard time making an absolute yes or no opinion on this! I can see both sides of the argument, and have talked to pediatricians who strongly support either side, too. I got the easy way out in this regard since my first child is a girl. I know some people compare it to piercing a girl’s ears (which I did not do), but earrings can be removed and there is no medical benefit to earrings, whereas there may be with circumcision. Hopefully I’ll have a clearer opinion before I have a boy!

  2. by Susan M. On June 21, 2011 at 7:04 am

    I am on the mailing list!

  3. by Susan M. On June 21, 2011 at 7:06 am

    Fan of Cottontail Baby on fb

  4. by Susan M. On June 21, 2011 at 7:06 am

    Fan of CDRC on fb

  5. by Abbie Neary On June 21, 2011 at 9:50 am

    I think that it is an unnecessary cosmetic procedure in most cases. However outlawing it opens another debate on religous freedoms. What would happen if it were left till men could choose if they wanted it done themselves say at 18 instead of causing totaly unnecessary pain and stress to helpless babies. How many of them would choose the procedure for themselves? Really…?

  6. by Abbie Neary On June 21, 2011 at 9:50 am

    I like CDRC on FB

  7. by Abbie Neary On June 21, 2011 at 9:51 am

    I like Cottontail Baby on FB

  8. by Abbie Neary On June 21, 2011 at 9:51 am

    I subscribe by email

  9. by Angela Heffner On June 21, 2011 at 11:59 am

    I think the Government should stay out of issues such as this one. I agree with Abbie that outlawing it would infringe on religious freedoms.
    I think parents need to do what they feel best for their children!
    angela_heffner at yahoo dot com

  10. by Angela Heffner On June 21, 2011 at 11:59 am

    FB Fan (Angela Ross Heffner)
    angela_heffner at yahoo dot com

  11. by Angela Heffner On June 21, 2011 at 12:00 pm

    I’m a FB fan of CDRC (Angela Ross Heffner)
    angela_heffner at yahoo dot com

  12. by Angela Heffner On June 21, 2011 at 12:00 pm

    joined the mailing list!
    angela_heffner at yahoo dot com

  13. by D On June 21, 2011 at 12:02 pm

    Even though I don’t use FaceBook (so I can’t enter your contest, I am on your mailing list), I wanted to comment anyway. Is a child considered your property? (I say no, we are merely their *caretakers* until they reach majority, not their *owners*). Since we do not “own” them, then how can one materially alter a child in a way that cannot be returned to the original state? (yes, we cut their hair, but hair can grow back). I think that if someone considered an adult (whatever that age happens to be, whether 18, or some younger or older number), and chooses to alter themselves, that is their right, as their body is their property to do with as they wish. This should be common-sense however, I don’t see a reason for yet another law.